|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
Pintle-regulated Venturi Air/Fuel Induction for Fuel Economy and Performance
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Fuel Economy Comparison1
|
Test Loop
|
Speed
|
Conventional Manifold
|
PRV Manifold
|
Percent Improvement
|
|
City
|
Variable
|
38 mpg2
|
42 mpg2
|
11%
|
|
Highway
|
65 mph
|
43 mpg3
|
53 mpg4
|
23%
|
|
Highway
|
65 mph
|
43 mpg3
|
58 mpg5
|
35%
|
|
Notes
No mechanical changes between tests other than the induction system and associated fuel map. Highway tests conducted on a closed-circuit test loop between Denver, CO and Brush, CO at 65 mph -- the same test used since June 2007. Honda D15B engine and low rolling resistance Sumitomo tires.
Average of seven 200-mile test loops. Throttle control improvement is expected to increase fuel economy and future designs.
Air/fuel ratio is stoichiometric, closed-loop control O2 sensor feedback control using a stock P08 electronic control unit. Test repeated three times with a range of 42 to 44 miles per gallon in ideal fair weather conditions with light wind.
Air/fuel ratio is stoichiometric, closed-loop control O2 sensor feedback control using a AEM electronic control unit.
Air/fuel ratio is 16.8, closed-loop control O2 sensor feedback control using a AEM electronic control unit.
Explanation for the improved fuel economy can be found by clicking here.
A simple analogy comparing engine and human respiration can be found here.
|
|